Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://ipicyt.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1010/2363
A comparative study on effectiveness of soapnut, rhamnolipid and EDTA in cleaning diesel oil contaminated soil from a commercial site in Edinburgh
John Idika
Elijah Ugwu
NADIA VALENTINA MARTINEZ VILLEGAS
Bhaskar Sen Gupta
Acceso Abierto
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas
Soil cleaning
EDTA
Soapnut
Rhamnolipid
"This study presents performances of soapnut, rhamnolipid and EDTA in washing soil contaminated with diesel oil. The soil was collected from a business park in Riccarton area of Edinburgh. The soil was contaminated with vehicle grade commercial diesel oil (BS EN590) available from a local gas station. While soapnut is derived from plant Sapindus mukorossi, rhamnolipid is a class of microbial surfactant produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and EDTA is an amino-polycarboxyilic acid, a synthetic chemical, widely used as a cleaning/chelating agent in industry. The optimum operating conditions for all three cleaning agents were established by Box-Behnken method. When such operating conditions were used for column washing, EDTA had the highest cumulative removal efficiency of 43.3%, followed by rhamnolipid and soapnut, which recorded 40.7% and 39.3% respectively. The cumulative diesel oil removed by distilled water was 3.7%. However, considering the low cost of soapnut, it will be more economical to use soapnut than Rhamnolipid or EDTA"
Heriot-Watt University
2020
Artículo
Idika, J., Ugwu, E., Martínez-Villegas, N., & Sen Gupta, B. (2020). A comparative study on effectiveness of soapnut, rhamnolipid and EDTA in cleaning diesel oil contaminated soil from a commercial site in Edinburgh. Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment, 13(4), 575-596.
INGENIERÍA Y TECNOLOGÍA DEL MEDIO AMBIENTE
Versión publicada
publishedVersion - Versión publicada
Aparece en las colecciones: Publicaciones Científicas Geociencias Aplicadas

Cargar archivos:


Fichero Tamaño Formato  
ResJChemEnviron13(2020)575.pdf2.4 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir